Why the US … is desperate !

 

Washington Drives The World To War — Paul Craig Roberts

 

April 14, 2014 | Categories: Articles & Columns | Tags: war, | Print This Article Print This Article

 

Washington Drives The World To War

 

Paul Craig Roberts

 

The CIA director was sent to Kiev to launch a military suppression of the Russian separatists in the eastern and southern portions of Ukraine, former Russian territories for the most part that were foolishly attached to the Ukraine in the early years of Soviet rule. 

 

Washington’s plan to grab Ukraine overlooked that the Russian and Russian-speaking parts of Ukraine were not likely to go along with their insertion into the EU and NATO while submitting to the persecution of Russian speaking peoples.  Washington has lost Crimea, from which Washington intended to eject Russia from its Black Sea naval base. Instead of admitting that its plan for grabbing Ukraine has gone amiss, Washington is unable to admit a mistake and, therefore, is pushing the crisis to more dangerous levels.

 

If Ukraine dissolves into secession with the former Russian territories reverting to Russia, Washington will be embarrassed that the result of its coup in Kiev was to restore the Russian provinces of Ukraine to Russia.  To avoid this embarrassment, Washington is pushing the crisis toward war.

 

The CIA director instructed Washington’s hand-picked stooge government in Kiev to apply to the United Nations for help in repelling “terrorists” who with alleged Russian help are allegedly attacking Ukraine. In Washington’s vocabulary, self-determination is a sign of Russian interference. As the UN is essentially a Washington-financed organization, Washington will get what it wants.

 

The Russian government has already made it completely clear some weeks ago that the use of violence against protesters in eastern and southern Ukraine would compel the Russian government to send in the Russian army to protect Russians, just as Russia had to do in South Ossetia when Washington instructed its Georgian puppet ruler to attack Russian peacekeeping troops and Russian residents of South Ossetia. 

 

Washington knows that the Russian government cannot stand aside while one of Washington’s puppet states attacks Russians.  Yet, Washington is pushing the crisis to war.

 

The danger for Russia is that the Russian government will rely on diplomacy, international organizations, international cooperation, and on the common sense and self-interest of German politicians and politicians in other of Washington’s European puppet states.

 

For Russia this could be a fatal mistake. There is no good will in Washington, only mendacity. Russian delay provides Washington with time to build up forces on Russia’s borders and in the Black Sea and to demonize Russia with propaganda and whip up the US population into a war frenzy.  The latter is already occurring. 

 

Kerry has made it clear to Lavrov that Washington is not listening to Russia. As Washington pays well, Washington’s European puppets are also not listening to Russia. Money is more important to European politicians than humanity’s survival.

 

In my opinion, Washington does not want the Ukraine matters settled in a diplomatic and reasonable way. It might be the case that Russia’s best move is immediately to occupy the Russian territories of Ukraine and re-absorb the territories into Russia from whence they came. This should be done before the US and its NATO puppets are prepared for war. It is more difficult for Washington to start a war when the objects of the war have already been lost. Russia will be demonized with endless propaganda from Washington whether or not Russia re-absorbs its traditional territories. If Russia allows these territories to be suppressed by Washington, the prestige and authority of the Russian government will collapse. Perhaps that is what Washington is counting on.

 

If Putin’s government stands aside while Russian Ukraine is suppressed, Putin’s prestige will plummet, and Washington will finish off the Russian government by putting into action its many hundreds of Washington-financed NGOs that the Russian government has so foolishly tolerated.  Russia is riven with Washington’s Fifth columns.

 

In my opinion, the Russian and Chinese governments have made serious strategic mistakes by remaining within the US dollar-based international payments system. The BRICS and any others with a brain should instantly desert the dollar system, which is a mechanism for US imperialism. The countries of the BRICS should immediately create their own separate payments system and their own exclusive communications/Internet system. 

 

Russia and China have stupidly made these strategic mistakes, because reeling from communist failures and oppressions, they naively assumed that Washington was pure, that Washington was committed to its propagandistic self-description as the upholder of law, justice, mercy,and  human rights.

 

In fact, Washington, the “exceptional, indispensable country,” is committed to its hegemony over the world. Russia, China, and Iran are in the way of Washington’s hegemony and are targeted for attack.

 

The attack on Russia is mounting.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

A true plum . . . by Blum !

 

Official website of the author, historian, and U.S. foreign policy critic.

 

The Anti-Empire Report #127

 

By William Blum – Published April 7th, 2014

 

http://williamblum.org/aer/read/12740

 

Indoctrinating a new generation

 

Is there anyone out there who still believes that Barack Obama, when he’s speaking about American foreign policy, is capable of being anything like an honest man? In a March 26 talk in Belgium to “European youth”, the president fed his audience one falsehood, half-truth, blatant omission, or hypocrisy after another. If George W. Bush had made some of these statements, Obama supporters would not hesitate to shake their head, roll their eyes, or smirk. Here’s a sample:

 

“In defending its actions, Russian leaders have further claimed Kosovo as a precedent – an example they say of the West interfering in the affairs of a smaller country, just as they’re doing now. But NATO only intervened after the people of Kosovo were systematically brutalized and killed for years.”

 

Most people who follow such things are convinced that the 1999 US/NATO bombing of the Serbian province of Kosovo took place only after the Serbian-forced deportation of ethnic Albanians from Kosovo was well underway; which is to say that the bombing was launched to stop this “ethnic cleansing”. In actuality, the systematic deportations of large numbers of people did not begin until a few days after the bombing began, and was clearly a reaction to it, born of Serbia’s extreme anger and powerlessness over the bombing. This is easily verified by looking at a daily newspaper for the few days before the bombing began the night of March 23/24, 1999, and the few days following. Or simply look at the New York Times of March 26, page 1, which reads:

 

… with the NATO bombing already begun, a deepening sense of fear took hold in Pristina [the main city of Kosovo] that the Serbs would now vent their rage against ethnic Albanian civilians in retaliation. [emphasis added]

 

On March 27, we find the first reference to a “forced march” or anything of that nature.

 

But the propaganda version is already set in marble.

 

“And Kosovo only left Serbia after a referendum was organized, not outside the boundaries of international law, but in careful cooperation with the United Nations and with Kosovo’s neighbors. None of that even came close to happening in Crimea.”

 

None of that even came close to happening in Kosovo either. The story is false. The referendum the president speaks of never happened. Did the mainstream media pick up on this or on the previous example? If any reader comes across such I’d appreciate being informed.

 

Crimea, by the way, did have a referendum. A real one.

 

“Workers and engineers gave life to the Marshall Plan … As the Iron Curtain fell here in Europe, the iron fist of apartheid was unclenched, and Nelson Mandela emerged upright, proud, from prison to lead a multiracial democracy. Latin American nations rejected dictatorship and built new democracies … “

 

The president might have mentioned that the main beneficiary of the Marshall Plan was US corporations http://williamblum.org/aer/read/127, that the United States played an indispensable role in Mandela being caught and imprisoned, and that virtually all the Latin American dictatorships owed their very existence to Washington. Instead, the European youth were fed the same party line that their parents were fed, as were all Americans.

 

“Yes, we believe in democracy – with elections that are free and fair.”

 

In this talk, the main purpose of which was to lambaste the Russians for their actions concerning Ukraine, there was no mention that the government overthrown in that country with the clear support of the United States had been democratically elected.

 

“Moreover, Russia has pointed to America’s decision to go into Iraq as an example of Western hypocrisy. … But even in Iraq, America sought to work within the international system. We did not claim or annex Iraq’s territory. We did not grab its resources for our own gain. Instead, we ended our war and left Iraq to its people and a fully sovereign Iraqi state that could make decisions about its own future.”

 

The US did not get UN Security Council approval for its invasion, the only approval that could legitimize the action. It occupied Iraq from one end of the country to the other for 8 years, forcing the government to privatize the oil industry and accept multinational – largely U.S.-based, oil companies’ – ownership. This endeavor was less than successful because of the violence unleashed by the invasion. The US military finally was forced to leave because the Iraqi government refused to give immunity to American soldiers for their many crimes.

 

Here is a brief summary of what Barack Obama is attempting to present as America’s moral superiority to the Russians:

 

The modern, educated, advanced nation of Iraq was reduced to a quasi failed state … the Americans, beginning in 1991, bombed for 12 years, with one dubious excuse or another; then invaded, then occupied, overthrew the government, tortured without inhibition, killed wantonly … the people of that unhappy land lost everything – their homes, their schools, their electricity, their clean water, their environment, their neighborhoods, their mosques, their archaeology, their jobs, their careers, their professionals, their state-run enterprises, their physical health, their mental health, their health care, their welfare state, their women’s rights, their religious tolerance, their safety, their security, their children, their parents, their past, their present, their future, their lives … More than half the population either dead, wounded, traumatized, in prison, internally displaced, or in foreign exile … The air, soil, water, blood, and genes drenched with depleted uranium … the most awful birth defects … unexploded cluster bombs lying in wait for children to pick them up … a river of blood running alongside the Euphrates and Tigris … through a country that may never be put back together again. … “It is a common refrain among war-weary Iraqis that things were better before the U.S.-led invasion in 2003,” reported the Washington Post. (May 5, 2007)

 

How can all these mistakes, such arrogance, hypocrisy and absurdity find their way into a single international speech by the president of the United States? Is the White House budget not sufficient to hire a decent fact checker? Someone with an intellect and a social conscience? Or does the desire to score propaganda points trump everything else? Is this another symptom of the Banana-Republicization of America?

 

Long live the Cold War

 

In 1933 US President Franklin D. Roosevelt recognized the Soviet Union after some 15 years of severed relations following the Bolshevik Revolution. On a day in December of that year, a train was passing through Poland carrying the first American diplomats dispatched to Moscow. Amongst their number was a 29 year-old Foreign Service Officer, later to become famous as a diplomat and scholar, George Kennan. Though he was already deemed a government expert on Russia, the train provided Kennan’s first actual exposure to the Soviet Union. As he listened to his group’s escort, Russian Foreign Minister Maxim Litvinov, reminisce about growing up in a village the train was passing close by, and his dreams of becoming a librarian, the Princeton-educated Kennan was astonished: “We suddenly realized, or at least I did, that these people we were dealing with were human beings like ourselves, that they had been born somewhere, that they had their childhood ambitions as we had. It seemed for a brief moment we could break through and embrace these people.” http://williamblum.org/aer/read/127

 

It hasn’t happened yet.

 

One would think that the absence in Russia of communism, of socialism, of the basic threat or challenge to the capitalist system, would be sufficient to write finis to the 70-year Cold War mentality. But the United States is virtually as hostile to 21st-century Russia as it was to 20th-century Soviet Union, surrounding Moscow with military bases, missile sites, and NATO members. Why should that be? Ideology is no longer a factor. But power remains one, specifically America’s perpetual lust for world hegemony. Russia is the only nation that (a) is a military powerhouse, and (b) doesn’t believe that the United States has a god-given-American-exceptionalism right to rule the world, and says so. By these criteria, China might qualify as a poor second. But there are no others.

 

Washington pretends that it doesn’t understand why Moscow should be upset by Western military encroachment, but it has no such problem when roles are reversed. Secretary of State John Kerry recently stated that Russian troops poised near eastern Ukraine are “creating a climate of fear and intimidation in Ukraine” and raising questions about Russia’s next moves and its commitment to diplomacy. http://williamblum.org/aer/read/127

 

NATO – ever in need of finding a raison d’être – has now issued a declaration of [cold] war, which reads in part:

 

“NATO foreign ministers on Tuesday [April 1, 2014] reaffirmed their commitment to enhance the Alliance’s collective defence, agreed to further support Ukraine and to suspend NATO’s practical cooperation with Russia. ‘NATO’s greatest responsibility is to protect and defend our territory and our people. And make no mistake, this is what we will do,’ NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said. … Ministers directed Allied military authorities to develop additional measures to strengthen collective defence and deterrence against any threat of aggression against the Alliance, Mr. Fogh Rasmussen said. ‘We will make sure we have updated military plans, enhanced exercises and appropriate deployments,’ he said. NATO has already reinforced its presence on the eastern border of the Alliance, including surveillance patrols over Poland and Romania and increased numbers of fighter aircraft allocated to the NATO air policing mission in the Baltic States. … NATO Foreign Ministers also agreed to suspend all of NATO’s practical cooperation with Russia.” http://williamblum.org/aer/read/127

 

Does anyone recall what NATO said in 2003 when the United States bombed and invaded Iraq with “shock and awe”, compared to the Russians now not firing a single known shot at anyone? And neither Russia nor Ukraine is even a member of NATO. Does NATO have a word to say about the right-wing coup in Ukraine, openly supported by the United States, overthrowing the elected government? Did the hypocrisy get any worse during the Cold War? Imagine that NATO had not been created in 1949. Imagine that it has never existed. What reason could one give today for its creation? Other than to provide a multi-national cover for Washington’s interventions.

 

One of the main differences between now and the Cold War period is that Americans at home are (not yet) persecuted or prosecuted for supporting Russia or things Russian.

 

But don’t worry, folks, there won’t be a big US-Russian war. For the same reason there wasn’t one during the Cold War. The United States doesn’t pick on any country which can defend itself.

 

Cuba … Again … Still … Forever

 

Is there actually a limit? Will the United States ever stop trying to overthrow the Cuban government? Entire books have been written documenting the unrelenting ways Washington has tried to get rid of tiny Cuba’s horrid socialism – from military invasion to repeated assassination attempts to an embargo that President Clinton’s National Security Advisor called “the most pervasive sanctions ever imposed on a nation in the history of mankind”. http://williamblum.org/aer/read/127But nothing has ever come even close to succeeding. The horrid socialism keeps on inspiring people all over the world. It’s the darnedest thing. Can providing people free or remarkably affordable health care, education, housing, food and culture be all that important?

 

And now it’s “Cuban Twitter” – an elaborately complex system set up by the US Agency for International Development (USAID) to disguise its American origins and financing, aiming to bring about a “Cuban Spring” uprising. USAID sought to first “build a Cuban audience, mostly young people; then the plan was to push them toward dissent”, hoping the messaging network “would reach critical mass so that dissidents could organize ‘smart mobs’ – mass gatherings called at a moment’s notice – that might trigger political demonstrations or ‘renegotiate the balance of power between the state and society’.” http://williamblum.org/aer/read/127It’s too bad it’s now been exposed, because we all know how wonderful the Egyptian, Syrian, Libyan, and other “Arab Springs” have turned out.

 

Here’s USAID speaking after their scheme was revealed on April 3: “Cubans were able to talk among themselves, and we are proud of that.” http://williamblum.org/aer/read/127We are thus asked to believe that normally the poor downtrodden Cubans have no good or safe way to communicate with each other. Is the US National Security Agency working for the Cuban government now?

 

The Associated Press, which broke the story, asks us further to believe that the “truth” about most things important in the world is being kept from the Cuban people by the Castro regime, and that the “Cuban Twitter” would have opened people’s eyes. But what information might a Cuban citizen discover online that the government would not want him to know about? I can’t imagine. Cubans are in constant touch with relatives in the US, by mail and in person. They get US television programs from Miami and other southern cities; both CNN and Telesur (Venezuela, covering Latin America) are seen regularly on Cuban television”; international conferences on all manner of political, economic and social issues are held regularly in Cuba. I’ve spoken at more than one myself. What – it must be asked – does USAID, as well as the American media, think are the great dark secrets being kept from the Cuban people by the nasty commie government?

 

Those who push this line sometimes point to the serious difficulty of using the Internet in Cuba. The problem is that it’s extremely slow, making certain desired usages often impractical. From an American friend living in Havana: “It’s not a question of getting or not getting internet. I get internet here. The problem is downloading something or connecting to a link takes too long on the very slow connection that exists here, so usually I/we get ‘timed out’.” But the USAID’s “Cuban Twitter”, after all, could not have functioned at all without the Internet.

 

Places like universities, upscale hotels, and Internet cafés get better connections, at least some of the time; however, it’s rather expensive to use at the hotels and cafés.

 

In any event, this isn’t a government plot to hide dangerous information. It’s a matter of technical availability and prohibitive cost, both things at least partly in the hands of the United States and American corporations. Microsoft, for example, at one point, if not at present, barred Cuba from using its Messenger instant messaging service. http://williamblum.org/aer/read/127

 

Cuba and Venezuela have jointly built a fiber optic underwater cable connection that they hope will make them less reliant on the gringos; the outcome of this has not yet been reported in much detail.

 

The grandly named Agency for International Development does not have an honorable history; this can perhaps be captured by a couple of examples: In 1981, the agency’s director, John Gilligan, stated: “At one time, many AID field offices were infiltrated from top to bottom with CIA people. The idea was to plant operatives in every kind of activity we had overseas, government, volunteer, religious, every kind.” http://williamblum.org/aer/read/127

 

On June 21, 2012, the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA) issued a resolution calling for the immediate expulsion of USAID from their nine member countries, “due to the fact that we consider their presence and actions to constitute an interference which threatens the sovereignty and stability of our nations.”

 

USAID, the CIA, the National Endowment for Democracy (and the latter’s subsidiaries), together or singly, continue to be present at regime changes, or attempts at same, favorable to Washington, from “color revolutions” to “spring” uprisings, producing a large measure of chaos and suffering for our tired old world.

 

http://williamblum.org/aer/read/12740

 

Notes

 

  1. William Blum, America’s Deadliest Export – Democracy: The Truth About US Foreign Policy and Everything Else, p.22-5
  2. Walter Isaacson & Evan Thomas, The Wise Men (1986), p.158
  3. Washington Post, March 31, 2014
  4. NATO takes measures to reinforce collective defence, agrees on support for Ukraine”, NATO website, April 1, 2014
  5. Sandy Berger, White House press briefing, November 14, 1997, US Newswire transcript
  6. Associated Press, April 3 & 4, 2014
  7. Washington Post, April 4, 2014
  8. Associated Press, June 2, 2009
  9. George Cotter, “Spies, strings and missionaries”, The Christian Century (Chicago), March 25, 1981, p.321

 

Any part of this report may be disseminated without permission, provided attribution to William Blum as author and a link to this website are given.

 

Issue #126

 

 

Top of Form

 

Bottom of Form

 

William Blum is an author, historian, and renowned critic of U.S. foreign policy. He is the author of Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II and Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s Only Superpower, among others. Read more

 

To rescue an old man from the clutches of the capitalist imperialist meanies …

 

Top of Form

 

 

 

Bottom of Form

 

Search

 

Top of Form

 

 

 

Bottom of Form

 

Subscribe

 

Top of Form

 

Be notified of new reports via email.

 

   

 

 

 

Bottom of Form

 

Subscribe via RSS

 

Books by William Blum

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Four Blood Red Moons … ? ? ?

 

|

Zionist apocalypse coming?

 

…by  Kevin Barrett,   with  Press TV

 

apocalypse-now
 
Will a Zionist apocalypse erupt during the coming two years?

 

Some Zionists seem to think so. They are predicting that an unusual series of lunar eclipses or “blood moons” expected in 2014 and 2015 augurs war and disaster on an epic scale.

 

One Zionist website warns: “It cannot be regarded as coincidence that all four blood moons of 2014/15 occur on religious festivals of Israel, together with two eclipses of the sun also on important days in 2015…According to NASA – Four ‘blood-red’ TOTAL lunar eclipses WILL fall again on Passover and Sukkoth in 2014 and 2015… the same back-to-back occurrences at the time of 1492, 1948 and 1967” (sic).

 

Meaning? “The events may involve war in the Middle East and a financial crisis around the world that will affect the land of Israel or the Jewish elite in New York City.”

 

These blood-moonbat Zionists think that 2014 or 2015 will go down in history alongside 1492 (the year that Jews, along with Muslims, were expelled from Spain), 1948 (the creation of the Zionist entity) and 1967 (the Zionist invasion and occupation of Jerusalem).

 

Citing a satanic Rothschild-financed hoax, the so-called Scofield Bible, these Zionists hope that 2014 or 2015 will bring a major Middle East war that will enable the Zionists to finish the ethnic cleansing of Palestine, demolish the al-Aqsa mosque, build a Zionist temple on the ruins of the mosque, and consecrate it with blood sacrifices – beginning with the slaughter of a pink heifer.

 

Are the Zionists insane? Obviously. But unfortunately, the ongoing influence of insanity on world affairs cannot be discounted.

 

If the Zionists believe blood moons bring war and financial crisis, they may just decide to plunge the world into war and financial crisis as a sort of self-fulfilling prophecy.

 

They would do well to consider the words of Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar: “The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, But in ourselves…”

 

The Zionists have been sowing seeds of hate. They will reap a harvest of calamity. When they do, they should not blame the stars.

 

Even the scriptural sources of the “blood moon” prophecies should give them pause.

 

If the Zionists considered their own scriptures more carefully, they would realize that they have it  backward. The prophecies they cite equate blood moons with disaster for the Jewish people. That means that the creation of the Zionist entity in 1948, and the murderous theft of Jerusalem in 1967, were disasters for the Jewish people – just like the expulsion from Spain in 1492. Therefore, we might expect 2014 and 2015 to bring an epic collapse of Zionism: The harvest of the toxic seeds sowed in 1948 and 1967.

 

But we do not need a Scofield Bible to forecast the collapse of Zionism. The worldwide anti-Zionist movement is growing every day – even in the “homelands” of the Zionist settler-colonial movement.

 

In Europe, more and more public figures are speaking out with increasing boldness against Zionism. The EU government has banned all 28 member states from cooperating with any Zionist entity that operates in the territories stolen in 1967 – including the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights.

 

A popular backlash against Zionism is exploding across Europe. Hundreds of thousands of Europeans have been flashing the “quenelle,” a satirical Zio-Nazi salute invented by France’s greatest contemporary comedian, Dieudonné. The authorities in France, who are under the thumb of the powerful French Zionist community, are panicking. They have prosecuted Dieudonné for speaking out against Zionism, and recently raided his house under a transparently bogus pretext. But every attempt to squash the “quenelle” just shows how powerful (and humorless) the Zionists really are, and convinces even more people to join the movement.

 

In the USA, the American Studies Association has launched the first academic boycott of Israel – a landmark breakthrough for the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement. Heavy-handed attempts to quash BDS, such as the New York State Legislature’s near-unanimous passage of a bill outlawing academic boycotts, are backfiring. Like the French government’s persecution of Dieudonné, and its brutal treatment of quenelle-flashing protesters at a huge demonstration in Paris, such actions simply underline that the French and American governments are under near-total Zionist control…which only increases the angry populist backlash.

 

This has nothing to do with the moon. The Zionists are facing catastrophe because they can no longer suppress the truth. In the age of the Internet, and the alternative media it spawned, simply buying up the mainstream media and the politicians no longer suffices.

 

So perhaps the Zionists really will be facing an apocalypse in the “blood moon” years of 2014 and 2015. But that does not necessarily mean world war or financial collapse.

 

The word “apocalypse” is popularly understood to mean “global catastrophe or calamity.” But its first meaning is “disclosure” or “unveiling” – the disclosure or unveiling of the truth.

 

It is not any Iranian nuclear bomb, or Palestinian population bomb, that should concern the Zionists. Their real enemy is the slow-motion truth bomb that is gradually exploding across the world.

 

Zionists vaguely sense this. They realize, on some level, that their racist colonial project is doomed. That is why they suffer from what Gilad Atzmon calls “pre-traumatic stress disorder.”

 

The unveiling of truth, and ensuing demand for justice, is the real “apocalyptic threat” that will soon bring about the annihilation of the Zionist entity.

 

Bookmark and Share

 

Related Posts:

 

 

Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=288331

 

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners. Legal Notice

Posted by Kevin Barrett on Feb 13 2014, With 6065 Reads, Filed under Editor, Israel.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

“Seek the truth, and you shall find it … and …”

 

 

NATURE HAS BEEN MADE ILLEGAL

 

 

 

 

 

The sabotage of all

life

 

 

 

 

 

THE FUTURE DEPENDS UPON BELIEVERS,

 

 

 

BUT EVERYTHING WE BELIEVE IS FALSE

 

By John Kaminski

pseudoskylax@gmail.com

http://therebel.org/news/kaminski/

As I see it, the only truly valid instruction we receive in this life comes from our parents when we are little. They warn us against burning ourselves, to avoid being hit by a passing car, and most especially, not to lie, or people won’t believe what we say. Which is why it always puzzled me that all the information we receive from society throughout our lives seeks to break down these initial instructions, these common sense safeguards given to us by the two people who love us most, our parents.

Now, our nightmare government claims to love us more than mom and dad, as they yank children into hospital gulags insisting untested medicines filled with toxic ingredients are more sensible than traditional remedies proven effective by generations of common practice. A government that seeks to protect us from ourselves is no government at all, but only our jailer, and all too often our killer.

We are constantly exhorted to challenge our parents’ view of life — smoke this, drink that — because our parents are ‘oppressing’ us, denying us our right to be free. This is the chief tenet of a nefarious group of Jewish psychiatrists called the Frankfurt School, who have convinced the world that the nuclear family is evil and must be destroyed.

Somehow the lure of the illicit and the forbidden captivates us when we are growing up. Glittering, profit-oriented society teaches us that it’s fun to court danger and go against the rules, all in search of that elusive holy grail we still can’t reliably identify that has been named freedom. It is primarily this philosophy that has turned the world into a giant terrifying prison of fear, this quest for an abstract freedom that we can never satisfactorily define.

Much to our parents’ dismay, society makes us believe we are in control of our lives long before we actually are. So we burn ourselves with forbidden booze and drugs. Some of us never kick these habits and become either permanent medical patients or sociopathic deceivers. If we aren’t hit by a car, we drive drunk and crash, or get away with more serious crimes, all against the advice — if they were healthy — of our parents. And boy, do we lie. We stay out late, do things we don’t want to admit, and some of us survive to teach these nasty habits to our children, in what is now known in psychiatric circles as the cycle of abuse, some forms of it nastier and more injurious than others.

Though many of us adopt formal moral codes as adults, those without strong parents abandon them as children. Especially kids from broken homes see that their parents, hard workers though they may be, can’t compete with the illicit dangers and stimulating rewards of the street, the flashy trends of society. It’s more fun to be bad. Bad guys have more fun and often get away with being bad. Girls have always gravitated to bad guys, and still do.

Today we have a situation where the people in charge of society are all criminals, participating in a universal scam and lying about as much of it as they can get away with. This is the way they are brought up, and this is what we all must deal with as soon as possible if we are to avoid a world divided into prisoners and guards, with the emotion known as compassion gone extinct.

Even though it can save the world, compassion is no longer fashionable because there is no financial profit in it. Or so society teaches us. Society, and all the word implies, regardless of the competitive excuse it uses, teaches us to kill each other, most of it unnecessarily in this so-called advanced age.

The danger of disbelief

Reincarnation is the oldest religion. Though it has been purged from most Western religions in favor of some imaginary la-la-land most people are blackmailed into accepting, which really is a mental prison created by those who control sociological beliefs.

Our refusal to accept the terms of life on this planet is as old as life itself.

All species exhibit it. It is known as the survival instinct. It is also called denial of death. The two things are not the same. To survive is instinctual. To deny death is insane.

Prey strive just as hard as predators to keep their lives. That predators succeed is nature’s way of balancing and ebb and flow of life itself. Somehow, nature has made it all even out. The result of this unfathomable balance of life and death has been a planet of incomprehensible beauty and justice. No one species ever gets too far ahead. When it does, the systems of nature balance things out.

Overkill of one species ultimately reduces the population of its predators, because eventually there is not enough for them to eat. Overpopulation of one species leads to a profusion of predators, to the point that a species will eventually start consuming itself because the group mind knows that things have gone out of balance, and its population must be reduced to maintain the level of health necessary for the Earth itself to maintain its survival.

Among the subcategories of this phenomenon, two actions stand out as particularly relevant to our own present predicament.

The first is that when in a situation of overpopulation relative to the available environment, some small cohort of a species will develop into saboteurs who will work to reduce the population in order to preserve species assets for its own self-selected subgroup.

The second is that when an overabundance of one species threatens the welfare of all species in the world. Then, all other species will turn against the one overabundant species to work for its demise. As the bees are dying, our future is darkening. And now you know why.

You can poke holes in the dogma of all religions, but what you can’t deny is that generally all universal religions attempt to uphold and venerate the beauty and the spirit of life, even though there may be no verifiable proof of the reason to do this, only the comfort that it brings to those who choose to believe the traditions.

Those who choose not to believe it wind up trying to tear it down, and generally commit crimes in trying to do so simply because they have no basis upon which to believe that life as it exists and has been provided for them is sufficient, or fair, or enjoyable; they want more, and will do anything to get it. They want to scratch an itch that can’t be relieved. These people usually become saboteurs, spies, and scam artists, without regard for other living things, all because they haven’t gotten what they think they should get out of life, even though it is readily available by following rules that exist.

Bad parents are the fastest way to find yourself among the nonbelievers. It’s tough to speculate how much of the world falls in this group. I think all parents love their children; it’s just that life and where they’ve been don’t allow them to give their kids what they need, and the downward cycle continues, all because their parents aren’t around to show them they are loved, and really because the parents don’t love themselves. Because they are afraid. Because they don’t believe.

Will the robots obey?

The Jews want to kill all natural life on this planet and replace it with inventions they’ve made themselves. They think they can improve on life, except that all the evidence from artificial life they have created thus far shows they can only create new and convoluted ways of death, with GMO grass that kills cows in the third generation and other biotech monstrosities that render the animals who eat them infertile. This is how they plan on killing everything that lives and populating the Earth with robots who they think will obey them. Just like so many unruly children.

Happy people accept what a lot of people call God’s plan. You follow certain rules, raise healthy children, and live happy lives, and don’t ask for any more than life allows. Some people, unhappy people, don’t think that’s enough. It has been a mental disease since the dawn of time that people want to live forever. They don’t accept life’s terms. First it was alchemy. Now it’s the singularity. Download our consciousness into indestructible robot bodies. You know what will happen if that ever succeeds. The mechanical being the Jews create will kill everything on Earth, and anything anywhere else they can get their insane hands on.

Though many millions of people convincingly claim they have lived lives prior to this one, nobody we know of has ever lived forever. At least they haven’t made themselves known. Nietzsche said the Bible said that God hated nature. And it’s true when you read it that way. God gave humans, or his favorite tribe of them, the right to do anything they wanted with the Earth, and what they chose to do was abuse and destroy it. Never a thought that the Earth sustained their lives. Never an inkling that the frequency of the Earth was identical to the frequency of humans, and that one couldn’t exist without the other.

However, uncountable millions of other believers in admittedly flawed and plagiarized dogma have made decent lives for themselves, raised exemplary children, and passed on surrounded by those who loved them who revered the wonderful impression the life of these beloved beings had made on those around them.

Devoted to their family and friends and their community and their nation, people from every country have utilized the religious traditions they were given to live decent lives. It was the betrayal of those principles that caused all the wars, not the practice of them. The savaging of religious systems by revolutionaries for the inevitable hypocrisy of its leaders has been patently unfair. It isn’t the systems that have debilitated human civilizations, but the men who subverted them for their own selfish purposes.

Unnatural vs. natural

It’s true. The happiest people are the believers. Their world is ordered. Their questions are answered. Their children have pink cheeks, they are free of disease and their parents are faithful to each other.

But how can you be a believer when everything you’re told is a lie? The Pope is OK with homos. So are first grade teachers. The land of the free and home of the brave is blowing up countries left and right and lying about it. The food you see advertised on TV is killing you — all of it.

Mad scientists are seeking to remake the world. Foremost among their plans is the elimination of most of the world’s population of humans. They’ve already practiced on most of the rest of the other species, and they’re all just about gone. This whole syndrome is all based on the mistaken notion that humans can actually improve the condition of life on the planet, when they don’t even understand how the process works to begin with.

The leaders of our country, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, laugh about killing innocent people. They laugh as they kill their own soldiers, their own ambassadors. Cops shoot people’s pets and murder harmless homeless people. Doctors knowingly prescribe poison medicines and conduct unnecessary surgeries.

The only people who believe in the United States are zombies. Unfortunately, they’re in power.

The most unnatural thing ever promoted in a widespread way is teaching homosexuality to first graders. They don’t even know what it means, but in a few short years, when their sexuality begins to awaken, they will follow the first impulse that presents itself, which will be an older predator fixated on the abused child that they themselves were. As a consequence they will destroy any chance some innocent child victim ever had to raise a normal family. The Bilderberger delusionals call this population control. I call it the destruction of the human race.

The riddle of the ages

Most of the things we have been taught have been false. Especially about American history. And also about religion. As a consequence it’s very difficult to believe in anything. When you look outside for some guidance, all you find are clever strategies cloaked in hypocrisy, gurus concealing perverted psychopathologies, and eager followers racing with certainty toward their own destruction (and taking lots of other people with them).

Yet we’re not getting out of this fix . . . we’re not getting out of this life  . . . without a belief in something. Amid all the staged turmoil of the world, we must choose to believe in something. The grand deception played upon everyone is that this truth can be found in the dogma that someone gives you. This is a grievous error. It can only be found inside yourself.

Everywhere we turn we see our government declaring natural things illegal, and ordering us to take unnatural medicines, eat unnatural food and participate in unnatural practices. When the government makes it the law of the land that we must eat poison food and take poison medicine, it is long past time to overthrow that government.

Believe that your have the right to defend yourself against twisted bureaucrats who don’t care about your welfare. It doesn’t matter what the law says or what the judge tells you to do. The doctors lie to make money. Saving your life is secondary to them.

Believe that you have the right to defend your life under any circumstances, no matter what anybody else tells you or how many people, or experts, or authority figures tells you to do unnatural things, like kill innocent people to make money for rich psychopaths, or pretend someone of the same sex is actually your spouse.

This is a debate that all comes down to one question: do you want to screw someone or do you want to love someone?

Anybody who tells you to do unnatural things like this needs to be terminated as soon as possible, and more importantly, you need to ignore their advice. Libido does not a working relationship make. Only mutual respect does.

This is just one more unnatural trick the Jews use to destabilize society, so they can take control of everyone and force them to consume their sick agenda of twisted slavery.

To put it another way, the Jews are the quintessence of unnatural practices, and we need to restore the natural world, live natural lives, and pretty much ignore everything the Jews have ever said. But first we need to eliminate them and their sick practices from human society. It’s the only way we will survive as recognizable humans.

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.

http://therebel.org/news/kaminski/

http://johnkaminski.info/

http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html

http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Who are… “We the People”?

 

 

America, minus the mask

First and foremost,

a nation of killers

 

 

 By John Kaminski

 

pseudoskylax@gmail.com

 

http://therebel.org/news/kaminski/

 

America is a nation of killers. It always has been, from the first Pilgrims who set foot in Massachusetts and later murdered the very people who had saved them from starvation. 

 

 

 

The entire American population is trapped in a self-delusion that they are heroes, fighting an endless string of evil enemies. But in fact their targeted enemies have always been innocent people, usually minding their own business, put in harm’s way by their own valuable possessions, which Americans inevitably covet, and will kill anyone to get.

 

 

 

You could say this sly, self-justifying homicidal behavior is really a human problem, endemic to every nation or ethnic group. More fashionable lately is to blame it all on the clever Jews, who have controlled America and most other countries in a surreptitious way for a very long time. But lately, at least for most of the last century, when the blood of innocents is seeping into ravaged landscapes charred by bombs, it has always been Americans doing the bulk of the killing. This is something — from Sand Creek to Dresden to My Lai to Fallujah — that makes them very proud.

 

 

 

You could say that they learned it all from the British, who learned it all from the Romans, but you’d be wrong. All the great empires of history were the greatest killers, and to think otherwise is to be naive. The most prosperous and forward looking countries have always been the best killers, and America, whose budget for wars and weapons exceeds the combined total of all the other countries of the world, is the most prodigious killer country of all time.

 

 

 

Something to be proud of, isn’t it? What is worth examining, however, is the false rhetoric justifying these murderous actions that is always couched in terms of the heroic protection of peace. Like the famous Vietnam maxim: we had to destroy the village in order to save it. 

 

 

 

Like some parasitic termite inexorably chomping on the beams of an elegant mansion, this philosophy is turning the world into a giant heap of irreparable rubble, which is exactly what Halliburton and all the other vampire corporations want — destroying the treasures of the past so knock-off substandard replacement structures can be built everywhere the U.S. government decides to destroy.

 

 

 

A simple analysis of the news bites of the day will show that the terror card is a false canard. The FBI fabricates all these crimes to show everyone there is a terrorist around every corner, but there aren’t any — there are only undereducated patsies induced to shoot their mouths off about misinformation they have misinterpreted and get themselves arrested for plots that never could have actually happened. Think Shoe Bomber, or Crotch Bomber, and millions in profits for Michael Chertoff and his airport cancer machines that catch no criminals, only cause disease.

 

 

 

In the glib propaganda of the present day, most of us forget that this is the self-serving lingo the conquerors. In World War I the targeted Germans became Huns eating babies in order to motivate American hayseeds to kill them. More recently, the U.S. president insisted that the Libyan dictator was killing his own people. So he then invaded that country and killed that leader. But then when the original lie is revealed that the Libyan dictator was actually treating his own people very generously, it was too late to reverse the American atrocity that had been committed. The so-called dictator has been raped and murdered in the streets of his own country, and 40,000 of his loyal countrymen have died along with him, all because of the American lie that was told so Israel’s gang of neocon thieves could steal both his oil and his water, not to mention his gold. Though the lie is revealed, the outcome may not be changed. This is a portrait of American justice around the world, the legacy that this obnoxious nation of killers continues to unleash upon the world.

 

 

 

Very few people are willing to admit that this has been the ethos upon which American prosperity was based.

 

 

 

Of course, it’s not really American justice. Those who have acquired any acumen whatsoever during the course of their lives about world politics knows beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is only one force in the whole world that determines everything, and that of course is money, and that all the money in the world has been controlled by Jewish billionaires ever since the time of Rothschild when Nathan Rothschild essentially stole the entire British treasury in 1815 when Wellington finally defeated Napoleon. Ever since that time, world politics has been dominated by very rich Jews controlling both your nation and your mind, but they’ve been so clever about it, the vast majority of the world’s population has had no clue that this has even occurred.

 

 

 

Things we dare not tell our children

 

 

 

American history as well as British history are very much Jewish history, a history written in blood and funded by drugs, sex and blackmail. American history and British history, very much inseparable, are not about the Magna Carta and the Declaration of Independence; they are much more about the genocide of native peoples all over the world, and their enslavement — the whole world has been enslaved by the Western business model. Who can say whether the Jews actually invented it in their takeover of all the countries of the world, or whether they just expropriated the model crafted by the Romans and fine-tuned by the Venetians?

 

 

 

All we know now is that American history and British history are cover stories for the Jewish takeover of reality that have resulted in this prison mentality that the very rich have the means and methods to tell everyone else what to do, and that message is to rape and plunder your way to the top, and pay no mind to the millions of people you have to crush into the mud of time to get the job done. All the fine words of theologians and philosophers are only meant to cover up the unspeakable realities of Hiroshima and Fukushima that aim to pare down the population to a manageable level on a plantation run by fellows with whips in their hands.

 

 

 

Deceived by their own reality and endlessly distracted by their own obligations, when parents send their children to schools, they have suppressed the knowledge that they are really sending their kids off to learn to be obedient killers.

 

 

 

With all the intelligent people IN the world observing all the tragic events and calculated frauds OF the world, I remain mystified why more people haven’t figured out that Jews are responsible for all the horrible things that make our lives so tenuous and dangerous every single day. 

 

 

 

The most horrible thing of all is that maybe we all wanted to this to happen, to have a ruthless leader tell us what to do so we wouldn’t have to think for ourselves that one day we are all going to die, and everything we build will mean nothing to us when we’re gone. Very likely this is the real reason for all the pointless killing for all the temporal profits and meaningless prizes.

 

 

 

How stupid are the American people not to notice that their so-called government is doing the same thing in Ukraine that it is doing in Syria and has done in dozens of countries, from Serbia to Yemen to Pakistan to Iraq. Every bit of it is couched in terms that allege America is promoting peace while conducting war.

 

 

 

Jewish-controlled America pays desperate mercenary criminals from around the world to destabilize independent governments. In Ukraine, Victoria Nuland, chief neocon agent for destabilization, had admitted the U.S. has spent $5 billion to generate regime change in Kiev. An Egyptian writer, Ashraf Ezzat, has pointed out that the same flyers used in Cairo to enrage the participants in that revolution was used in Kiev to enflame the paid revolutionaries in Ukraine.

 

 

 

They don’t even keep their treason a secret anymore. For more than two decades now, the U.S. has fomented chaos in Iraq by sending in billions of dollars on pallets to be paid to everyone who wants to keep fighting (which is virtually the entire population of the Third World), and especially to the American mercenaries for that company that keeps changing its name but once was called Blackwater, now showing up as the private armies of Ukrainian neocon oligarchs.

 

 

 

How proud must Americans be that the U.S. continues to be the war making giant of the whole world, expropriating the position that we insisted was occupied by Russia when it was the USSR. Russia was never this blatant or this aggressive in infiltrating and bribing the citizens of multiple nations into betraying their own countries. All it takes nowadays is a fistful of practically worthless dollars, and the U.S. sucks another prostituted nation into the corrupt orbit of the Jewish New World Order.

 

 

 

However, in today’s herniated reality, American pride soon gives way to pain when the soldiers doing the Jews’ business around the world come and find there are no jobs except prison guards available to them, and that both their rights and their guns have been taken away from them. When they see that, and realize that the people they killed were really just like them, suicide doesn’t seem like such a bad option.

 

 

 

No profit in peace

 

 

 

We all need to protect ourselves from the police. They are the criminals. They don’t protect people. They only protect bankers. Nowadays, they are best known as killing people for fun, and shooting the pets of innocent people.

 

 

 

The lawyers will not defend you and the judges will not listen to your pleas about honesty, morality or justice. The justice system has become just another cash cow, allowing people on the inside to get rich off the luckless patsies on the outside. What they said would happen is now true — the world has been divided into a society of prisoners and guards, and God help you if you can’t a job as a guard.

 

 

 

Does anybody out there still believe that Afghanistan was a worthwhile project? Worth six thousand American lives, not to mention hundreds of thousand natives? All to protect the poppy crop? How much do you really know? How much do you want to know? Do you want to know how to keep yourself alive?

 

 

 

Do you understand the need to overthrow this government? Do you realize there is no one in the federal government who cares about your continuing existence?

 

 

 

When nations advocate torture

 

 

 

As America’s infrastructure continues to crumble, successive corrupt U.S administrations have squandered billions to foment revolutions and spread the tyranny of the World Bank around the world.

 

 

 

The high minded rhetoric of JFK in the 1960s which encouraged public service as a way to make the world a better place has given way to the obscene trivialities of George W. Bush calling the Constitution “just a piece of paper” and Barack Obama removing the  Constitutional protections of habeas corpus and trial by jury, totalitarian moves that have been applauded by a media controlled and drug addled populace no longer able to distinguish spin from logic and nobility from perversion.

 

 

 

I don’t remember exactly when it became publicly acceptable to torture political prisoners and send them to foreign jails to be mutilated, but it was well after we knew that the so-called wars from which these prisoners were snatched were phony deals from the beginning, long after Zbigniew Brzezinski had created al-Qaeda as a means of forcing the Russians out of Afghanistan.

 

 

 

Bad at math, the American people could not put 2 plus 2 together and realize that every single hapless person ever imprisoned at Guantanamo was absolutely innocent because the United States had created the enemy it was pretending to fight.

 

 

 

No, the American people have feigned ignorance but actually approved all these crimes against hapless countries with no air forces and innocent people who have committed no crimes, only gotten in the way of New World Order drug smuggling and parking their camels in the way of oil and gas pipelines.

 

 

 

A few of us try to stand up and point out that this is all wrong, but our voices are lost in a tidal wave of irrelevant trivia that is more important to most people than their own lives, than their own well being. And as new planes are launched and new bombs dropped, our voices are drowned out by the ugly sounds of people gasping for breath and dying, because of our refusal to acknowledge that we ourselves have failed to protest the lies that are killing them.

 

 

 

Because of our profound ignorance, our families will soon suffer the same fate of those innocent people who have died because we did not have the courage to confront the lies we were told, and are still being told.

 

 

 

A nation of killers living on lies is what America has turned out to be. If you call yourself an American, you must accept that as the truth, and act accordingly in some way to try to redeem yourself from the thoughtless scumbag that history will judge you as having been. Or at least you will have to do that if you care about anything at all.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.

 

http://therebel.org/news/kaminski/

 

http://johnkaminski.info/

 

http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html

 

http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/

 

 

 

 

 

#

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Real truth… Whole truth… Nothing but Truth!

 

The Anti-Empire Report #126

 

By William Blum – Published March 7th, 2014

 

 

 

Ukraine

 

When it gets complicated and confusing, when you’re overwhelmed with too much information, changing daily; too many explanations, some contradictory … try putting it into some kind of context by stepping back and looking at the larger, long-term picture.

 

The United States strives for world domination, hegemony wherever possible, their main occupation for over a century, it’s what they do for a living. The United States, NATO and the European Union form The Holy Triumvirate. The Holy Triumvirate has subsidiaries, chiefly The International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, International Criminal Court … all help to keep in line those governments lacking the Holy Triumvirate Seal Of Approval: the IMF, WB, and WTO impose market fundamentalism, while foreign leaders who act too independent are threatened with being handed over to the ICC for heavy punishment, as the United States imposes sanctions on governments and their leaders as only the King of Sanctions can, lacking any sense of hypocrisy or irony.

 

And who threatens United States domination? Who can challenge The Holy Triumvirate’s hegemony? Only Russia and China, if they were as imperialistic as the Western powers. (No, the Soviet Union wasn’t imperialistic; that was self-defense; Eastern Europe was a highway twice used by the West to invade; tens of millions of Russians killed or wounded.)

 

Since the end of the Cold War the United States has been surrounding Russia, building one base after another, ceaselessly looking for new ones, including in Ukraine; one missile site after another, with Moscow in range; NATO has grabbed one former Soviet Republic after another. The White House, and the unquestioning American mainstream media, have assured us that such operations have nothing to do with Russia. And Russia has been told the same, much to Moscow’s continuous skepticism. “Look,” said Russian president Vladimir Putin about NATO some years ago, “is this is a military organization? Yes, it’s military. … Is it moving towards our border? It’s moving towards our border. Why?”

 

The Holy Triumvirate would love to rip Ukraine from the Moscow bosom, evict the Russian Black Sea Fleet, and establish a US military and/or NATO presence on Russia’s border. (In case you were wondering what prompted the Russian military action.) Kiev’s membership in the EU would then not be far off; after which the country could embrace the joys of neo-conservatism, receiving the benefits of the standard privatization-deregulation-austerity package and join Portugal, Ireland, Greece, and Spain as an impoverished orphan of the family; but no price is too great to pay to for being part of glorious Europe and the West!

 

The Ukrainian insurgents and their Western-power supporters didn’t care who their Ukrainian allies were in carrying out their coup against President Viktor Yanukovych last month … thugs who set policemen on fire head to toe … all manner of extreme right-wingers, including Chechnyan Islamic militants … a deputy of the ultra-right Svoboda Party, part of the new government, who threatens to rebuild Ukraine’s nukes in three to six months. … the snipers firing on the protestors who apparently were not what they appeared to be – A bugged phone conversation between Urmas Paet, the Estonian foreign minister, and EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, reveals Paet saying: “There is now stronger and stronger understanding that behind the snipers it was not Yanukovych, but it was somebody from the new coalition.” … neo-Nazi protestors in Kiev who have openly denounced Jews, hoisting a banner honoring Stepan Bandera, the infamous Ukrainian nationalist who collaborated with the German Nazis during World War II and whose militias participated in atrocities against Jews and Poles.

 

The Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported on February 24 that Ukrainian Rabbi Moshe Reuven Azman advised “Kiev’s Jews to leave the city and even the country.” Edward Dolinsky, head of an umbrella organization of Ukrainian Jews, described the situation for Ukrainian Jews as “dire” and requested Israel’s help.

 

All in all a questionable gang of allies for a dubious cause; reminiscent of the Kosovo Liberation Army thugs Washington put into power for an earlier regime change, and has kept in power since 1999.

 

The now-famous recorded phone conversation between top US State Department official Victoria Nuland and the US ambassador to the Ukraine, wherein they discuss which Ukrainians would be to Washington’s liking in a new government, and which not, is an example of this regime-change mentality. Nuland’s choice, Arseniy Yatseniuk, emerged as interim prime minister.

 

The National Endowment for Democracy, an agency created by the Reagan administration in 1983 to promote political action and psychological warfare against states not in love with US foreign policy, is Washington’s foremost non-military tool for effecting regime change. The NED website lists 65 projects that it has supported financially in recent years in Ukraine. The descriptions NED gives to the projects don’t reveal the fact that generally their programs impart the basic philosophy that working people and other citizens are best served under a system of free enterprise, class cooperation, collective bargaining, minimal government intervention in the economy, and opposition to socialism in any shape or form. A free-market economy is equated with democracy, reform, and growth; and the merits of foreign investment in their economy are emphasized.

 

The idea was that the NED would do somewhat overtly what the CIA had been doing covertly for decades, and thus, hopefully, eliminate the stigma associated with CIA covert activities. Allen Weinstein, who helped draft the legislation establishing NED, declared in 1991: “A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA.”

 

NED, receives virtually all its financing from the US government ($5 billion in total since 1991), but it likes to refer to itself as an NGO (Non-governmental organization) because this helps to maintain a certain credibility abroad that an official US government agency might not have. But NGO is the wrong category. NED is a GO. Its long-time intervention in Ukraine is as supra-legal as the Russian military deployment there. Journalist Robert Parry has observed:

 

For NED and American neocons, Yanukovych’s electoral legitimacy lasted only as long as he accepted European demands for new “trade agreements” and stern economic “reforms” required by the International Monetary Fund. When Yanukovych was negotiating those pacts, he won praise, but when he judged the price too high for Ukraine and opted for a more generous deal from Russia, he immediately became a target for “regime change.”

 

Thus, we have to ask, as Mr. Putin asked – “Why?” Why has NED been funding 65 projects in one foreign country? Why were Washington officials grooming a replacement for President Yanukovych, legally and democratically elected in 2010, who, in the face of protests, moved elections up so he could have been voted out of office – not thrown out by a mob? Yanukovych made repeated important concessions, including amnesty for those arrested and offering, on January 25, to make two of his adversaries prime minister and deputy prime minister; all to no avail; key elements of the protestors, and those behind them, wanted their putsch.

 

Carl Gershman, president of NED, wrote last September that “Ukraine is the biggest prize”. 6The man knows whereof he speaks. He has presided over NED since its beginning, overseeing the Rose Revolution in Georgia (2003), the Orange Revolution in Ukraine (2004), the Cedar Revolution in Lebanon (2005), the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan (2005), the Green Revolution in Iran (2009), and now Ukraine once again. It’s as if the Cold War never ended.

 

The current unbridled animosity of the American media toward Putin also reflects an old practice. The United States is so accustomed to world leaders holding their tongue and not voicing criticism of Washington’s policies appropriate to the criminality of those policies, that when a Vladimir Putin comes along and expresses even a relatively mild condemnation he is labeled Public Enemy Number One and his words are accordingly ridiculed or ignored.

 

On March 2 US Secretary of State John Kerry condemned Russia’s “incredible act of aggression” in Ukraine (Crimea) and threatened economic sanctions. “You just don’t in the 21st century behave in 19th century fashion by invading another country on completely trumped up pre-text.”

 

Iraq was in the 21st century. Senator John Kerry voted for it. Hypocrisy of this magnitude has to be respected.

 

POSTSCRIPT:Ukraine’s interim prime minister announced March 7 that he has invited the NATO Council to hold a meeting in Kiev over the recent developments in the country. “I invited the North Atlantic Council to visit Kiev and hold a meeting there,” Arseny Yatsenyuk said during a visit to Brussels, where he met with NATO SecretaryGeneral Anders Fogh Rasmussen and EU officials. “We believe that it will strengthen our cooperation.”

 

Love among nations

 

by Viktor Dedaj, Paris, France

 

Washington’s response, or lack of it, has confirmed the authenticity of a YouTube clip of a leaked telephone conversation between US Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt that emerged February 6. In the call, posted by an anonymous Russian source, Nuland and Pyatt discuss installing a new, pro-US government that will incorporate the fascistic opposition which had been leading street protests against Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych. Even though Washington’s campaign for regime-change had been coordinated with the European Union, in the phone conversation with Pyatt, Nuland attacks the EU for being insufficiently aggressive, saying at one point, “Fuck the EU.” The same source has provided us with the text of a subsequent conversation between the EU and the US.

 

A Question re: Syria

 

There have been numerous news stories about Syrian government bombing of its civilian areas, with reports of many dead, and photos and videos of heavily damaged buildings. The source of the stories I’ve come across, when it’s mentioned at all, is almost always some element of the “rebels”; i.e., those opposing the Syrian government.

 

In all these stories – Have you ever seen a photo or a video of a plane dropping bombs? Or of the bombs in the air? I’m not saying that the bombings have not taken place. I’m just wondering why there is no graphic evidence of them.

 

Dialogue with readers

 

Last month’s report evoked an unusually large number of critical responses, concerning two basic issues:

 

1) My questioning the widely-held belief that if John F. Kennedy had not been assassinated he would have ended US military involvement in Vietnam. Those who wrote to me are convinced that in a second term as president, without the need to worry about re-election, the genuine liberal and man of peace residing inside JFK would have been free to blossom, and he would quickly have put an end to a war that he supposedly abhorred.

 

I had written in the report: “It appears that we’ll never know with any kind of certainty what would have happened if JFK had not been assassinated, but I still go by his Cold War record in concluding that US foreign policy would have continued along its imperial, anti-communist path.”

 

As I read letter after letter challenging this assertion, the thought occurred to me: This is just what we heard for four years concerning Barack Obama – In his second term the genuine liberal and man of peace would emerge; the Nobel Peace Laureate would show why he deserved the prize. Well, do I need to go into the awful details of the man’s second term, from drone assassinations to relentless persecution of whistleblowers who question his foreign policy?

 

In the land where happiness is guaranteed in the Declaration of Independence

 

President Obama and many other political and media figures have once again made discussion about the minimum wage a heated subject. Time for me to repeat something I wrote in 2007:

 

“Think raising the minimum wage is a good idea?”

 

“Think again.”

 

That was the message of a full-page advertisement that appeared in major newspapers in January. It was accompanied by statements of approval from the usual eminent suspects:

 

“The reason I object to the minimum wage is I think it destroys jobs, and I think the evidence on that, in my judgment, is overwhelming.” Alan Greenspan, former Federal Reserve Chairman

 

“The high rate of unemployment among teenagers, and especially black teenagers, is both a scandal and a serious source of social unrest. Yet it is largely a result of minimum wage laws.” Milton Friedman, Nobel Prize-winning economist

 

Well, if raising the minimum wage can produce such negative consequences, then surely it is clear what we as an enlightened and humane people must do. We must lower the minimum wage. And thus enjoy less unemployment, less social unrest. Indeed, if we lower the minimum wage to zero, particularly for poor blacks … think of it! … No unemployment at all! Hardly any social unrest! In fact – dare I say it? – What if we did away with wages altogether?

 

“The modern conservative is engaged in one of man’s oldest exercises in moral philosophy: that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.” – John Kenneth Galbraith

 

http://williamblum.org/aer/read/12656

 

Notes

 

  1. Guardian Weekly (London), June 27, 2001
  2. RT television (RT.com, Moscow/Washington, DC), March 1, 2014
  3. Deputy Mikhail Golovko, RT, March 1, 2014
  4. RT, March 5, 2014, “The EU’s Ukraine policy and moral bankruptcy”; the phone conversation is believed to have taken place February 26.
  5. NED 2012 Annual Report
  6. Washington Post, September 22, 1991
  7. Victoria Nuland, speaking at the National Press Club, Washington, DC, December 13, 2013
  8. Washington Post, September 26, 2013
  9. “Face the Nation”, CBS, March 2, 2014

 

Any part of this report may be disseminated without permission, provided attribution to William Blum as author and a link to this website are given.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

History stands … before US !

 

Thanks to: TEAParty.org

 

Obama Nation

 

February 19, 2014

 

Holder can’t justify Obama’s

executive actions

 

 

 

(Breitbart) – Attorney General Eric Holder flubbed a question from Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) that is of vital importance to the rule of law.

 

While the Constitution allows – and sometimes requires – executive action on many matters, President Barack Obama has asserted executive authority in unprecedented ways. When Lee asked why one of Obama’s orders does not violate the Constitution, Holder – the chief legal officer of the nation – had no answer.

 

During a Senate oversight hearing, Lee asked Holder by what legal authority Obama suspended Obamacare’s employer mandate, which covers all companies with 50 or more employees. Holder admitted that he had no ready answer, that there were legal memos on this subject, but that he could not recall what they said. Lee sharply criticized this lack of an answer and requested that Holder provide to the committee copies of the legal memos making the case for Obama to be able to do this.

 

Video shows the details of the exchange, in which Holder said the President was on the strongest footing of taking action that changes the law governing the country.

 

Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution specifies the oath a person must take before he can exercise the powers of the presidency. As Obama has said twice, “I, Barack Hussein Obama, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

 

There are two elements: faithful execution and upholding the Constitution. Article II, Section 3 then explains what faithfully executing the office means, specifically imposing upon each president the duty that “he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” This means the president will adhere to each provision of the Constitution, enforce and administer all federal statutes and treaties, and defend those laws if they are challenged in court.

 

As I explore in my academic work “Take Care, Now,” forthcoming this spring in theHarvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, the Framers of the Constitution included the Take Care Clause to address a profound threat to a nation under the rule of law. The British king would sometimes exercise what was called the Royal Prerogative, whereby he would simply decline to uphold certain provisions of an Act of Parliament when he decided enforcement was unwarranted, or when it became politically inconvenient.

 

That is what Obama is doing. As my previous reporting explains in greater detail, the employer mandate is essential to the entire Affordable Care Act’s running as it is designed, and it does not permit anyone – including the president – to alter its requirements or waive its penalties.

 

The Take Care Clause requires the American head of state to carry out every Act of Congress adopted by the American people’s elected legislators. It also requires the president to obey every provision in the Constitution, giving full force to all of its powers and never stepping beyond any of its limitations.

 

Executive orders are more than just allowed by the Constitution; they are required by it. That’s because they are the means whereby presidents instruct their department heads and agencies specifically how to carry out certain programs and administer provisions in certain laws. They are part of faithfully executing laws made by Congress.

 

However, they are not presidential lawmaking, because that would be illegal. Article I, Section 1 of the Constitution provides that all legislative power is vested in Congress alone. Congress makes the laws, and the president enforces those laws. He can never make those laws.

 

It is even worse here, as Obama is lawmaking by negative. As I’ve previously written, you completely rewrite – or completely nullify – a law if you decline to enforce certain provisions in that law.

 

Similarly, executive agencies have always issued regulations to implement federal laws. In fact, many executive orders are nothing more than a president’s ordering an agency to develop new regulations to do a more effective job of carrying out a federal law. Those regulations carry the force of law.

 

Ever since FDR’s New Deal, new agencies have promulgated regulations that are substantive rather than just procedural. They look like mini-laws, instead of a play-by-play manual of how-to steps for carrying out Congress’s laws. For the past 80 years, the Supreme Court has struck down regulations that cross the line into lawmaking, and courts will regularly interpret regulations however narrowly is necessary to keep them within the boundaries of what Congress has authorized.

 

Obama has taken the problem of executive overreach to a new level, however. At least, even with federal regulations, an agency must go through a long process of public notice and receiving public comment before issuing regulations, and those rules can be taken to court under the Administrative Procedure Act, and “set aside” by the court if those regulations are “arbitrary or capricious,” “in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations,” or “otherwise not in accordance with law.”

 

By contrast, Obama is simply declaring things to be laws through executive orders that are not authorized by any Act of Congress. It fits a larger pattern, such as his agencies’ claiming the power to tell churches whom their ministers and leaders will be, proclaiming the U.S. Senate to be in recess when the Senate is in session so that Obama can make top-level appointments without Senate approval, and ordering Christian companies and Catholic charities to offer healthcare related to abortion. It is lawmaking through executive fiat.

 

Yet Holder cannot explain why the Constitution does not forbid what Obama is doing, or instead if Obama has actually created an imperial presidency. By not even having an answer ready, one has to wonder if he even considered this critically important question.

 

Then again, Holder serves under a president who at Monticello on Feb. 10 gave as a one-line summary of what being president means, “I can do whatever I want.” So is anyone surprised anymore?

 

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/02/19/Holder-Can-t-Explain-If-Constitution-Allows-Obama-s-Executive-Actions

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Will … WE … be next ?

Washington Orchestrated Protests Are Destabilizing Ukraine

Paul Craig Roberts

The protests in the western Ukraine are organized by the CIA, the US State Department, and by Washington- and EU-financed Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) that work in conjunction with the CIA and State Department. The purpose of the protests is to overturn the decision by the independent government of Ukraine not to join the EU.

The US and EU were initially cooperating in the effort to destroy the independence of Ukraine and make it a subservient entity to the EU government in Brussels. For the EU
government, the goal is to expand the EU. For Washington the purposes are to make
Ukraine available for looting by US banks and corporations and to bring Ukraine into NATO so that Washington can gain more military bases on Russia’s frontier. There are three countries in the world that are in the way of Washington’s hegemony over the world–Russia, China, and Iran. Each of these countries is targeted by Washington for overthrow or for their sovereignty to be degraded by propaganda and US military bases that leave the countries vulnerable to attack, thus coercing them into accepting Washington’s will.

The problem that has arisen between the US and EU with regard to Ukraine is that Europeans have realized that the takeover of Ukraine is a direct threat to Russia, which can cut Europe off from oil and natural gas, and if there is war completely destroy Europe. Consequently, the EU became willing to stop provoking the Ukraine protests.

The response of the neoconservative, Victoria Nuland, appointed Assistant Secretary of State by the duplicitous Obama, was “fuck the EU,” as she proceeded to describe the members of the Ukraine government that Washington tended to impose on a people so unaware as to believe that they are achieving independence by rushing into Washington’s arms. I once thought that no population could be as unaware as the US population. But I was wrong. Western Ukrainians are more unaware than Americans.

The orchestration of the “crisis” in Ukraine is easy. The neoconservative Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland told the National Press Club in Washington on December 13, 2013, that the US has “invested” $5 billion in agitation in Ukraine. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article37599.htm The crisis essentially resides in western Ukraine where romantic ideas about Russian oppression are strong and the population is less Russian than in the eastern Ukraine.

The hatred of Russia in western Ukraine is so dysfunctional that the duped protesters are unaware that joining the EU means the end of Ukraine independence and rule by the EU bureaucrats in Brussels, the European Central Bank, and US corporations. Perhaps Ukraine is two countries. The western half could be given to the EU and US corporations, and the eastern half could be reincorporated as part of Russia, where the entire Ukraine resided for as long as the US has existed.

The disaffection from Russia that exists in western Ukraine makes it easy for the EU and US to cause trouble. Those in Washington and Europe who wish to destroy Ukraine’s independence portray an independent Ukraine as a hostage of Russia, while a Ukraine in the EU is allegedly under the protection of the US and Europe. The large sums of money that Washington funnels into NGOs in Ukraine propagate this idea and work the population into a mindless frenzy. I have never in my life witnessed people as mindless as the Ukrainian protesters who are destroying the independence of their country.

The US- and EU-financed NGOs are fifth columns designed to destroy the independence of the countries in which they operate. Some pretend to be “human rights organizations.” Others indoctrinate people under cover of “education programs” and “building democracy.” Others, especially those run by the CIA, specialize in provocations such as “Pussy Riot.” Few if any of these NGOs are legitimate. But they are arrogant. The head of one of the NGOs announced prior to the Iranian elections in which Mousavi was Washington’s and the CIA’s candidate that the election would result in a Green Revolution. He knew this in advance, because he had helped to finance it with US taxpayer dollars. I wrote about it at the time. It can be found on my website, www.paulcraigroberts.org and in my just published book, How America Was Lost.

The Ukrainian “protesters” have been violent, but the police have been restrained. Washington has a vested interest in keeping the protests going in the hopes of turning the protests into revolt so that Washington can grab Ukraine. This week the US House of Representatives passed a resolution threatening sanctions should the violent protests be put down by the police.

In other words, if the Ukrainian police behave toward violent protesters in the way that US police behave toward peaceful protesters, it is reason for Washington to interfere in the internal affairs of Ukraine. Washington is using the protests to destroy the independence of Ukraine and has ready the list of puppets that Washington intends to install as Ukraine’s next government.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

The truth about … America’s Lies !

 

William Blum

 

Official website of the author, historian, and U.S. foreign policy critic.

 

The Anti-Empire Report #125

 

By William Blum – Published February 4th, 2014

 

http://williamblum.org/aer/read/12526

 

“Bias in favor of the orthodox is frequently mistaken for ‘objectivity’. Departures from this ideological orthodoxy are themselves dismissed as ideological.” – Michael Parenti

 

An exchange in January with Paul Farhi, Washington Post columnist, about coverage of US foreign policy:

 

Dear Mr. Farhi,

 

Now that you’ve done a study of al-Jazeera’s political bias in supporting Mohamed Morsi in Egypt, is it perhaps now time for a study of the US mass media’s bias on US foreign policy? And if you doubt the extent and depth of this bias, consider this:

 

There are more than 1,400 daily newspapers in the United States. Can you name a single paper, or a single TV network, that was unequivocally opposed to the American wars carried out against Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Panama, Grenada, and Vietnam? Or even opposed to any two of these wars? How about one? In 1968, six years into the Vietnam war, the Boston Globe http://williamblum.org/aer/read/125surveyed the editorial positions of 39 leading US papers concerning the war and found that “none advocated a pull-out”.

 

Now, can you name an American daily newspaper or TV network that more or less gives any support to any US government ODE (Officially Designated Enemy)? Like Hugo Chávez of Venezuela or his successor, Nicolás Maduro; Fidel or Raúl Castro of Cuba; Bashar al-Assad of Syria; Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran; Rafael Correa of Ecuador; or Evo Morales of Bolivia? I mean that presents the ODE’s point of view in a reasonably fair manner most of the time? Or any ODE of the recent past like Slobodan Milosevic of Serbia, Moammar Gaddafi of Libya, Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe, or Jean-Bertrand Aristide of Haiti?

 

Who in the mainstream media supports Hamas of Gaza? Or Hezbollah of Lebanon? Who in the mainstream media is outspokenly critical of Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians? And keeps his or her job?

 

Who in the mainstream media treats Julian Assange or Chelsea Manning as the heroes they are?

 

And this same mainstream media tell us that Cuba, Venezuela, Ecuador, et al. do not have a real opposition media.

 

The ideology of the American mainstream media is the belief that they don’t have any ideology; that they are instead what they call “objective”. I submit that there is something more important in journalism than objectivity. It is capturing the essence, or the truth, if you will, with the proper context and history. This can, as well, serve as “enlightenment”.

 

It’s been said that the political spectrum concerning US foreign policy in the America mainstream media “runs the gamut from A to B”.

 

Sincerely, William Blum, Washington, DC

 

(followed by some of my writing credentials)

 

 

Reply from Paul Farhi:

 

I think you’re conflating news coverage with editorial policy. They are not the same. What a newspaper advocates on its editorial page (the Vietnam example you cite) isn’t the same as what or how the story is covered in the news columns. News MAY have some advocacy in it, but it’s not supposed to, and not nearly as overt or blatant as an editorial or opinion column. Go back over all of your ODE examples and ask yourself if the news coverage was the same as the opinions about those ODEs. In most cases. I doubt it was.

 

 

Dear Mr. Farhi,

 

Thank you for your remarkably prompt answer.

 

Your point about the difference between news coverage and editorial policy is important, but the fact is, as a daily, and careful, reader of the Post for the past 20 years I can attest to the extensive bias in its foreign policy coverage in the areas I listed. Juan Ferrero in Latin America and Kathy Lally in the Mideast are but two prime examples. The bias, most commonly, is one of omission more than commission; which is to say it’s what they leave out that distorts the news more than any factual errors or out-and-out lies. My Anti-Empire Report contains many examples of these omissions, as well as some errors of commission.

 

Incidentally, since 1995 I have written dozens of letters to the Post pointing out errors in foreign-policy coverage. Not one has been printed.

 

Happy New Year

 

 

I present here an extreme example of bias by omission, in the entire American mainstream media: In my last report I wrote of the committee appointed by the president to study NSA abuses – Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies – which actually came up with a few unexpected recommendations in its report presented December 13, the most interesting of which perhaps are these two:

 

“Governments should not use surveillance to steal industry secrets to advantage their domestic industry.”

 

“Governments should not use their offensive cyber capabilities to change the amounts held in financial accounts or otherwise manipulate the financial systems.”

 

So what do we have here? The NSA being used to steal industrial secrets; nothing to do with fighting terrorism. And the NSA stealing money and otherwise sabotaging unnamed financial systems, which may also represent gaining industrial advantage for the United States.

 

Long-time readers of this report may have come to the realization that I’m not an ecstatic admirer of US foreign policy. But this stuff shocks even me. It’s the gross pettiness of “The World’s Only Superpower”.

 

A careful search of the extensive Lexis-Nexis database failed to turn up a single American mainstream media source, print or broadcast, that mentioned this revelation. I found it only on those websites which carried my report, plus three other sites: Techdirt, Lawfare, and Crikey (First Digital Media).

 

For another very interesting and extreme example of bias by omission, as well as commission, very typical of US foreign policy coverage in the mainstream media: First read the January 31, page one, Washington Post article making fun of socialism in Venezuela and Cuba.

 

Then read the response from two Americans who have spent a lot of time in Venezuela, are fluent in Spanish, and whose opinions about the article I solicited.

 

I lived in Chile during the 1972-73 period under Salvadore Allende and his Socialist Party. The conservative Chilean media’s sarcastic claims at the time about shortages and socialist incompetence were identical to what we’ve been seeing for years in the United States concerning Venezuela and Cuba. The Washington Post article on Venezuela referred to above could have been lifted out of Chile’s El Mercurio, 1973.

 

[Note to readers: Please do not send me the usual complaints about my using the name “America(n)” to refer to “The United States”. I find it to be a meaningless issue, if not plain silly.]

 

JFK, RFK, and some myths about US foreign policy

 

On April 30, 1964, five months after the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, his brother, Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, was interviewed by John B. Martin in one of a series of oral history sessions with RFK. Part of the interview appears in the book “JFK Conservative” by Ira Stoll, published three months ago. (pages 192-3)

 

RFK: The president … had a strong, overwhelming reason for being in Vietnam and that we should win the war in Vietnam.

 

MARTIN: What was the overwhelming reason?

 

RFK: Just the loss of all of Southeast Asia if you lost Vietnam. I think everybody was quite clear that the rest of Southeast Asia would fall.

 

MARTIN: What if it did?

 

RFK: Just have profound effects as far as our position throughout the world, and our position in a rather vital part of the world. Also it would affect what happened in India, of course, which in turn has an effect on the Middle East. Just as it would have, everybody felt, a very adverse effect. It would have an effect on Indonesia, hundred million population. All of those countries would be affected by the fall of Vietnam to the Communists.

 

MARTIN: There was never any consideration given to pulling out?

 

RFK: No.

 

MARTIN: … The president was convinced that we had to keep, had to stay in there …

 

RFK: Yes.

 

MARTIN: … And couldn’t lose it.

 

RFK: Yes.

 

These remarks are rather instructive from several points of view:

 

  1. Robert Kennedy contradicts the many people who are convinced that, had he lived, JFK would have brought the US involvement in Vietnam to a fairly prompt end, instead of it continuing for ten more terrible years. The author, Stoll, quotes a few of these people. And these other statements are just as convincing as RFK’s statements presented here. And if that is not confusing enough, Stoll then quotes RFK himself in 1967 speaking unmistakably in support of the war.

 

It appears that we’ll never know with any kind of certainty what would have happened if JFK had not been assassinated, but I still go by his Cold War record in concluding that US foreign policy would have continued along its imperial, anti-communist path. In Kennedy’s short time in office the United States unleashed many different types of hostility, from attempts to overthrow governments and suppress political movements to assassination attempts against leaders and actual military combat; with one or more of these occurring in Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, British Guiana, Iraq, Haiti, Dominican Republic, Cuba and Brazil.

 

  1. “Just have profound effects as far as our position throughout the world, and our position in a rather vital part of the world.”

 

Ah yes, a vital part of the world. Has there ever been any part of the world, or any country, that the US has intervened in that was not vital? Vital to American interests? Vital to our national security? Of great strategic importance? Here’s President Carter in his 1980 State of the Union Address: “An attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States of America”.

 

“What a country calls its vital economic interests are not the things which enable its citizens to live, but the things which enable it to make war.” – Simone Weil (1909-1943), French philosopher

 

  1. If the US lost Vietnam “everybody was quite clear that the rest of Southeast Asia would fall.”

 

As I once wrote:

 

Thus it was that the worst of Washington’s fears had come to pass: All of Indochina – Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos – had fallen to the Communists. During the initial period of US involvement in Indochina in the 1950s, John Foster Dulles, Dwight Eisenhower and other American officials regularly issued doomsday pronouncements of the type known as the “Domino Theory”, warning that if Indochina should fall, other nations in Asia would topple over as well. In one instance, President Eisenhower listed no less than Taiwan, Australia, New Zealand, the Philippines and Indonesia amongst the anticipated “falling dominos”. http://williamblum.org/aer/read/125

 

Such warnings were repeated periodically over the next decade by succeeding administrations and other supporters of US policy in Indochina as a key argument in defense of such policy. The fact that these ominous predictions turned out to have no basis in reality did not deter Washington officialdom from promulgating the same dogma up until the 1990s about almost each new world “trouble-spot”, testimony to their unshakable faith in the existence and inter-workings of the International Communist Conspiracy.

 

Killing suicide

 

Suicide bombers have become an international tragedy. One can not sit in a restaurant or wait for a bus or go for a walk downtown, in Afghanistan or Pakistan or Iraq or Russia or Syria and elsewhere without fearing for one’s life from a person walking innocently by or a car that just quietly parked nearby. The Pentagon has been working for years to devise a means of countering this powerful weapon.

 

As far as we know, they haven’t come up with anything. So I’d like to suggest a possible solution. Go to the very source. Flood selected Islamic societies with this message: “There is no heavenly reward for dying a martyr. There are no 72 beautiful virgins waiting to reward you for giving your life for jihad. No virgins at all. No sex at all.”

 

Using every means of communication, from Facebook to skywriting, from billboards to television, plant the seed of doubt, perhaps the very first such seed the young men have ever experienced. As some wise anonymous soul once wrote:

 

A person is unambivalent only with regard to those few beliefs, attitudes and characteristics which are truly universal in his experience. Thus a man might believe that the world is flat without really being aware that he did so – if everyone in his society shared the assumption. The flatness of the world would be simply a “self-evident” fact. But if he once became conscious of thinking that the world is flat, he would be capable of conceiving that it might be otherwise. He might then be spurred to invent elaborate proofs of its flatness, but he would have lost the innocence of absolute and unambivalent belief.

 

We have to capture the minds of these suicide bombers. At the same time we can work on our own soldiers. Making them fully conscious of their belief, their precious belief, that their government means well, that they’re fighting for freedom and democracy, and for that thing called “American exceptionalism”. It could save them from committing their own form of suicide.

 

http://williamblum.org/aer/read/12526

 

Notes

 

  1. Boston Globe, February 18, 1968, p.2-A
  2. New York Times, April 8, 1954

 

Any part of this report may be disseminated without permission, provided attribution to William Blum as author and a link to this website are given.

 

Issue #124

 

 

Top of Form

 

Bottom of Form

 

William Blum is an author, historian, and renowned critic of U.S. foreign policy. He is the author of Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II and Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s Only Superpower, among others. Read more

 

To rescue an old man from the clutches of the capitalist imperialist meanies …

 

Top of Form

 

 

 

Bottom of Form

 

Search

 

Top of Form

 

 

 

Bottom of Form

 

Subscribe

 

Top of Form

 

Be notified of new reports via email.

 

   

 

 

 

Bottom of Form

 

Subscribe via RSS

 

Books by William Blum

 

America’s Deadliest Export: Democracy

 

America’s Deadliest Export: Democracy

 

The Truth About US Foreign Policy and Everything Else

 

Rogue State

 

Rogue State

 

A Guide to the World’s Only Superpower

 

Killing Hope

 

Killing Hope

 

U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II

 

Freeing the World to Death

 

Freeing the World to Death

 

Essays on the American Empire

 

West-Bloc Dissident

 

West-Bloc Dissident

 

A Cold War Memoir

 

Send comments, typos found, money, love notes, hate mail, death threats, letter bombs, and anthrax to bblum6@aol.com
Top of page

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Believe it or … it’s consequences ?

 

Has NASA Mooned America?

 

 

 

Firstly, some quotes from William Branham:

 

“I tell you now, it’s a program that’ll take you a hundred billion, billion, million light years beyond the moon. That’s right. And there if you go to the moon you couldn’t set down because see, you’d jump right back up unless you had some magnet to hold you there. You couldn’t stay over night; you’d freeze to death. In the daytime you’d burn up.* What you going to do when you get there?” (Basis of Fellowship 61-0214)

* The surface temperature at the lunar equator during the day is 134oC (+273oF), and at night is -153oC (-244oF).
* The lunar day (from sunrise to sunrise) is approximately 708 hours or 29.5 Earth days.

(NASA survey February, 2012 Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera).

“Oh, now they’re all wanting to make a whole lot of these astronaut cans so they can get into it. And the atomic age comes, they’re going to bust up the world; they just pull this and all go over on the moon, taking a trip to the moon, and have it all over with, and so they’ll just make them another economy on the moon. They ain’t going to get there. I don’t believe, with all my heart, they’ll ever get there. See?” (Countdown 20:101 62-0909M)

“What do you call it the man’s day for?” you would say. It’s the day that the works by the knowledge of man is glorified. Look what all the brag of the Communists. Somebody try and get somebody to the moon. God’s trying to get somebody to heaven. See? But look how they’re spending millions, and billions, and trillions of dollars in a wasted effort. When they get there they ain’t going to find nothing. What’s the matter with them? I don’t care about the moon. I want to pass the moon so fast I won’t even see it, just keep going higher. I want to pass the milky, white way, go on, just keep going. Yes.” (God of this Evil Age 18:85 65-0801M)

Now the Book reviewed by Wayne Green (W2NSD/1),(El Supremo and Founder of 73 Amateur Radio Today. See Issue #429, June 1996).

A book came a couple days ago from a reader who wanted to swap it for copies of some of my books. This one sure got may attention. I was busy trying to find out more about dowsing from a couple of new books l’d just bought, but this one made me put everything else down.

My first reaction was probably what yours will be. It’s “NASA Mooned America!” by Rene, 196p, 1994. The ridiculous claim is that the Apollo missions to the moon never actually happened. Oh, Lordy, give me a break! What is this, some Flat Earth Society-type crappola? However, not being completely controlled by what I have been conditioned to believe, I read on. Rene has done a masterful job of destroying what little faith I had left in NASA. He shows evidence that many of their photographs of the moon missions are clearly bogus; he proves beyond a reasonable doubt that nobody can survive in space beyond the protection of the Van Allen Belt: and so on. By the time he’s through, there’s just no doubt that our government has produced a $40 billion space opera for us.

Yes, of course, Wayne has gone off his rocker with this one. Sure. Okay, smarty, what’s the temperature in space? Hot? Cold? We all know it’s awfully cold, right? The fact is, when the sun is shining on anything it gets blistering hot. The surface of the moon is 243øF in the sun and for the two weeks of night. Our astronauts were just there in the daylight, so they were dealing with an environment that was around 250ø, with nowhere near enough power to run the cooling system needed to deal with that. Rene goes into every aspect of the inability of any living thing to survive the solar flares that occurred during the missions with the little shielding used, the temperatures involved in space and on the moon. The astronauts reported that the LEM blasted a deep crater in landing on the moon. Why has not one NASA photo of the LEM on the moon ever shown a hint of this crater? They do show undisturbed dirt, complete with footprints (more about this impossibility later).

There are endless holes in the NASA production. Wait’ll you see the not quite hidden power cords in some photos supposedly taken on the moon. Then there’s one photo in the book of Aldrin and Armstrong saluting the flag, where they claim the sun is at about 13ø, but Aldrin’s photo was taken when the sun was at 26.4ø and Armstrong’s was taken with the sun at 34.9ø, if one goes by the shadows they cast. Worse, the shadows are in two different directions, and the flag casts no shadow at all. The angles of the sun were calculated by the lengths of the shadows compared to the height of the men. The sun moves about 10ø a day, so Aldrin’s photo would have had to be taken a day after they claimed, and Armstrong’s a day later, all followed by some computer trickery to combine them.

 

Or was all of this done in a secret Nevada CIA base?

 

Rene provides a book full of proof that the whole moon deal was a fake put together by NASA and the CIA. It’s a very well-written and researched book. It reduces our Right Stuff heroes to mere actors who have gone along with a Hollywood-type production. And those who caused any problems were killed! Did the “accidents” which killed 11 astronauts in 1967 raise any questions in your mind?

 

Illusions

 

It’s difficult for me to get used to the real world. it sure isn’t anything like I was taught in school, or anything my parents led me to believe. The more I learn, the less I have to believe in. Politics is crooked clear through, with money, via lobbies, firmly in control. The medical industry is just as crooked, protecting its $1 trillion business with the co-operation of the government. Our legal system is seriously corrupt, as is our educational Industry, again with the complicity of the government. Our academic system is corrupt, again in bed with our government. Should I mention our tobacco industry? And liquor industry? Our public water supplies, packed with chlorine and fluorides? Oh yes, our dental industry, with amalgams and root canals. Our food industry, providing us with hormones, pesticides, antibiotics, and de-mineralized produce.

So l suppose I am pretty dumb, or at least naive, to be surprised to read an expose showing NASA to be siphoning off billions to produce block-buster entertainment epics, hand in hand with the CIA.

The worst part is that even with our government and, as far as I know, every major industry, thoroughly corrupt, we seem to have the best country in the world. Maybe I should just shut up and go along to get along. Maybe I should go back to grumbling about the bad language, rudeness, and brain-free contacts on our ham bands. And fan the flames between no-coders and old-timers. The CW and phone ops. And any other ham schisms.

Say, those confounded packeteers aren’t going to screw around with the Internet, are they?

Heck if you get to know many of the ARRL directors beyond the thoroughly white-washed meeting reports in QST, you’ll find out in what contempt they hold the members. That really disillusioned me when I got on the inside and got to know all the players. Suddenly I found that the ARRL General Manager, the League counsel, and the directors all thought of the members as sheep, with no opinions worthy of consideration. It’s the same arrogant attitude I see in most politicians.

Hey, if I suddenly “die” of a heart attack, I want you to know that my heart is in fine shape and that the CIA seems to leave a trail of heart attack victims who have caused trouble. Shades of the KGB! The Apollo mission data is still highly classified, so my reporting on the book may be endangering our country.

 

Exit Line

 

When this book arrived and I saw that it was an expose of NASA, claiming that the moon flights were all faked, I expected to start reading the unusual unsupported baloney like that which supports just about every claim I’ve read for zero-point energy, N-machines, and other mysterious new power sources. I was a 100% total believer in space flight. Oh I didn’t think the potential benefits of visiting Mars were worth the investment, considering the federal deficit, so I was glad to see that program canceled last year. Ditto the super collider.

But I’ve been a space fan since childhood. I got hooked early by a cartoon strip around 1929 called “Jack Swift.” No relation to Tom Swift, though later in my childhood I enjoyed those books. Buck Rogers was there, but he didn’t hold a candle to Jack Swift. Nor did Flash Gordon. Heck, the early Buck Rogers cartoons still had people using airplanes in the 25th century. Tsk.

So the whole idea that the Apollo flights had been no more real than the recent award-winning Apollo-13 movie was totally preposterous. But once I started reading l couldn’t stop. Indisputable evidence piled up, fact after fact. As far as I know, no one who has read the book remains unconvinced that the world has been sucked in by one of the biggest snow jobs in history. If you read the book and aren’t amazed at the enormousness of the deceit, and the success NASA and the ClA have had in keeping, it secret. I sure want to hear from you.

Well, they did as good a job with secrecy on the Manhattan Project back 50-some years ago.

And why didn’t Russia blow the whistle, when they had to know early on that man would never survive in space beyond the Van Allen Belt without massive shielding against the intense radiation from solar flares? Read the book on our cost to bribe them.

Say, I wonder what else our beloved government has been doing that we haven’t heard about? Let me know, okay?

 

NASA Mooned America!

 

Self-published by Ralph Rene, 176p, 1994 US$30.00 All inclusive! FOR USA Delivery Check or Money Order, “NO Credit cards”! Mail to: Ralph Rene 3321 West Weir Road, Scottsburg, IN. 47170 USA. Include your name & mailing address and Phone Number. (Or within Australia @A$45 from Mr. David Barton, “Derrima” Collarenebri, NSW 2833). Theme of this book is that NASA never put a man on the moon; that the whole Apollo saga was just a Hollywood-like production done with the help of the CIA. My reaction on opening the book was that this is totally ridiculous. Crazy. Impossible. By the end of the first chapter I was starting to wonder if I’d sucked in on a $40 billion NASA production. By the end of the book I was convinced that, as impossible as it seems, the whole world has been suckered. If you read this book and find any fault with any of the 30 “gotcha’s” I want to hear from you. For instance, the moon’s surface has no moisture whatever. So why do we see boot prints where the astronauts have walked? You’ve walked in dry dirt and sand. It takes moisture to hold a print. When I start listing problems, every scientist I’ve talked to has ordered a copy of the book. Also available from the same author is “The Last Skeptic of Science”.

…/Back to Contents

 


 

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/

 

 

 

Has NASA Mooned America?

 

 

 

Firstly, some quotes from William Branham:
Now the Book reviewed by Wayne Green
Or was all of this done in a secret Nevada CIA base?
Illusions
Exit Line
NASA Mooned America!
NASA warped our view of space
The Moon, a source of both X-rays and gamma-rays.

 

NASA Masonic Conpsiracy scientific evidence from the
pen of the late Willaim Cooper
America’s Masonic Astronauts
Apollo Moon Hoax
Apollo Reality
Was It Only a Paper Moon real audio/video

      

US Astronaut<br /><br /><br />
Leroy Gordon Cooper

 

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon. Recently discovered forgotten, unedited footage (dated three days into the flight) showing the Apollo 11 crew falsifying part of their photography!
Soviet Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin was never in Space reports that demonstrate Soviet Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin was never in space—a cosmic lie with which the CIA was fully aware.
Russia Continues to Surpass Americans in the Space Race, a letter from Mr. Mark Farrell to the editor of Pravda.
Apollo Moon Missions Anomalies & Inconsistencies
Fake Moon Landings Exposed
NASA exposes their Apollo Moon landing Hoax!
The Greatest Story Ever Denied: Interdimensional Reality
It is not possible to fly to the Moon and back because rocket engines cannot lift the amount of fuel required.

A professional photographer writes: The first thing that made me suspicious of the alleged Moon Landing were the Photos. To me they were BAD Fakes. . .

NASA astronautHassellblad 500 EL/70

 

I used a Hasselblad camera for many years. The Astronauts had their Hasselblads fixed to their chest and those helmets made it impossible to bend their heads to look into the viewfinder. I believe their cameras did NOT have viewfinders, so HOW did they focus? They had NO lightmeter so HOW did they measure the light? With those thick gloves HOW did they adjust the F-Stop and shutterspeed? HOW did they change films?

Kodak film, in a Hasselblad camera, like those worn by the phony ‘moon-walkers,’ begins to melt at 150oF. Heat is infra-red radiation and will expose the sensitive film, as it did when we left our cameras in cars years ago. Most meat is well done at 160oF, and there were NO air conditioner units mounted on the cameras (or anywhere else) to combat 273oF heat, so NO pictures could be brought back to analyze their fraud.

Roverlanding moduleWHY is it when on TV News programmes, when two journalists are talking, say one in Canberra one in Sydney, that because of the distance there is a TIME-LAPSE when answering questions, BUT in discussions between the MOON and HOUSTON there was NO TIME LAPSE? HOW is it that the moon’s surface is supposedly very dry like the sand on the beach yet their boots left SHARP imprints in the sand? Their little Rover threw up clouds of sand when it drove around BUT on the landing pads of their landing rocket there was NO sand . . . . ALSO, their lander stood upright on legs and facing the sky so HOW did the astronauts get that Buggy OUT of their landing module?

 

Here are 33 points that need to be answered!

 

1) Sceptics argue that the lack of stars on Moon photographs is acceptable, despite zero atmosphere to obscure the view. Yuri Gagarin, pronounced the stars to be “astonishingly brilliant.” See the official NASA pictures above that I have reproduced that show ‘stars’ in the sky, as viewed from the lunar surface. And why exactly do you think there are hardly any stars visible on Apollo films taken from the Moon? The answer is simple—Professional astronomers would quickly calculate that the configuration and distances of star formations were incorrect and so NASA had to remove them to make sure they could keep up the scam.

Faked LM on Moon2) The pure oxygen atmosphere in the module would have melted the Hasselblad’s camera covering and produced poisonous gases. Why weren’t the astronauts affected?

3) There should have been a substantial crater blasted out under the LM’s 10,000 pound thrust rocket. Sceptics would have you believe that the engines only had the power to blow the dust from underneath the LM as it landed. If this is true, how did Armstrong create that famous boot print if all the dust had been blown away?

4) Sceptics claim that you cannot produce a flame in a vacuum because of the lack of oxygen. So how come footage showing flame coming from the exhaust of an Apollo lander? (Either the sceptics are wrong or the footage shows the lander working in an atmosphere).

5) Footprints are the result of weight displacing air or moisture from between particles of dirt, dust, or sand. Armstrong called it powder. Astronauts left distinct footprints all over the place.

6) The Apollo 11 TV pictures were poor, yet the broadcast quality magically became fine on the five subsequent missions.

Faked Aldrin walking on Moon7) Why in most Apollo photos, is there a clear line of definition between the rough foreground and the smooth background?

8) Why did so many NASA Moonscape photos have non parallel shadows? sceptics will tell you because there is two sources of light on the Moon—the Sun and the Earth . . . . That maybe the case, but the shadows would still fall in the same direction, not two or three different angles and Earth shine would have no effect during the bright lunar day (the time at which the Apollo was on the Moon).

9) Why did one of the stage prop rocks have a capital “C” on it and a ‘C’ on the ground in front of it?

10) How did the fibreglass whip antenna on the Gemini 6A capsule survive the tremendous heat of atmospheric re-entry?

11) In Ron Howard’s 1995 science fiction movie, Apollo 13, astronauts lose electrical power and begin worrying about freezing to death. In reality, of course, the relentless bombardment of the Sun’s rays would rapidly have overheated the vehicle to lethal temperatures with no atmosphere into which to dump the heat build up.

12) Who would dare risk using the LM on the Moon when a simulated Moon landing was never tested?

13) Instead of being able to jump at least ten feet high in “one sixth” gravity, the highest jump was about nineteen inches.

14) Even though slow motion photography was able to give a fairly convincing appearance of very low gravity, it could not disguise the fact that the astronauts travelled no further between steps than they would have on Earth.

15) If the Rover buggy had actually been moving in one-sixth gravity, then it would have required a twenty foot width in order not to have flipped over on nearly every turn. The Rover had the same width as ordinary small cars.

16) An astrophysicist who has worked for NASA writes that it takes two meters of shielding to protect against medium solar flares and that heavy ones give out tens of thousands of rem in a few hours. Russian scientists calculated in 1959 that astronauts needed a shield of 4 feet of lead to protect them on the Moons surface. Why didn’t the astronauts on Apollo 14 and 16 die after exposure to this immense amount of radiation? And why are NASA only starting a project now to test the lunar radiation levels and what their effects would be on the human body if they have sent 12 men there already?

17) The fabric space suits had a crotch to shoulder zipper. There should have been fast leakage of air since even a pinhole deflates a tyre in short order.

18) The astronauts in these “pressurized” suits were easily able to bend their fingers, wrists, elbows, and knees at 5.2 p.s.i. and yet a boxer’s 4 p.s.i. speed bag is virtually unbendable. The guys would have looked like balloon men if the suits had actually been pressurized.

19) How did the astronauts leave the LEM? In the documentary ‘Paper Moon’ The host measures a replica of the LEM at The Space Centre in Houston, what he finds is that the ‘official’ measurements released by NASA are bogus and that the astronauts could not have got out of the LEM.

20) The water sourced air conditioner backpacks should have produced frequent explosive vapour discharges. They never did.

21) During the Apollo 14 flag setup ceremony, the flag would not stop fluttering.

22) With more than a two second signal transmission round trip, how did a camera pan upward to track the departure of the Apollo 16 LEM? Gus Grissom, before he got burned alive in the Apollo I disaster A few minutes before he was burned to death in the Apollo I tragedy, Gus Grissom said, ‘Hey, you guys in the control center, get with it. You expect me to go to the moon and you can’t even maintain telephonic communications over three miles.’ This statement says a lot about what Grissom thought about NASA’s progress in the great space race.

23) Why did NASA’s administrator resign just days before the first Apollo mission?

24) NASA launched the TETR-A satellite just months before the first lunar mission. The proclaimed purpose was to simulate transmissions coming from the moon so that the Houston ground crews (all those employees sitting behind computer screens at Mission Control) could “rehearse” the first moon landing. In other words, though NASA claimed that the satellite crashed shortly before the first lunar mission (a misinformation lie), its real purpose was to relay voice, fuel consumption, altitude, and telemetry data as if the transmissions were coming from an Apollo spacecraft as it neared the moon. Very few NASA employees knew the truth because they believed that the computer and television data they were receiving was the genuine article. Merely a hundred or so knew what was really going on; not tens of thousands as it might first appear.

25) In 1998, the Space Shuttle flew to one of its highest altitudes ever, three hundred and fifty miles, hundreds of miles below merely the beginning of the Van Allen Radiation Belts. Inside of their shielding, superior to that which the Apollo astronauts possessed, the shuttle astronauts reported being able to “see” the radiation with their eyes closed penetrating their shielding as well as the retinas of their closed eyes. For a dental x-ray on Earth which lasts 1/100th of a second we wear a 1/4 inch lead vest. Imagine what it would be like to endure several hours of radiation that you can see with your eyes closed from hundreds of miles away with 1/8 of an inch of aluminium shielding! (Are We Trapped on Earth? Impossible Journey).

The Solar Wind is the major source of ionizing radiation which strikes Earth’s TWO protective shields, the magnetic field and the Van Allen Belt. This extends from 500 miles above Earth’s surface to over 100,000 miles into space. Space orbiters must stay well below 500 miles beneath the VAB due to high radiation trapped there that will even damage equipment.

The Solar Wind is an extension of the Corona, a ‘soup’ of deadly ionizing radiation. The major types of radiation particles in the Solar Wind are protons, alpha particles, and electrons (beta) traveling at the speed of light and contributing the VELOCITY of the Solar Wind. Solar flare activity, massive major nuclear explosions on the surface of the Sun, increase the Solar Wind, raising radiation to levels powerful enough to affect power grids on Earth. Scientists believe that the solar wind has stripped away the original atmosphere of Mars, hence there is no life on Mars.

26) The Apollo 1 fire of January 27, 1967, killed what would have been the first crew to walk on the Moon just days after the commander, Gus Grissom, held an unapproved press conference complaining that they were at least ten years, not two, from reaching the Moon. The dead man’s own son, who is a seasoned pilot himself, has in his possession forensic evidence personally retrieved from the charred spacecraft (that the government has tried to destroy on two or more occasions). Gus Grissom was obviously trying to make a big statement as he placed a lemon in the window of the Apollo I spacecraft as it sat ready for launch!

27) CNN issued the following report, “The radiation belts surrounding Earth may be more dangerous for astronauts than previously believed (like when they supposedly went through them thirty years ago to reach the Moon). The phenomenon known as the ‘Van Allen Belts’ can spawn (newly discovered) ‘Killer Electrons’ that can dramatically affect the astronauts’ health.”

28) In 1969 computer chips had not been invented. The maximum computer memory was 256k, and this was housed in a large air conditioned building. In 2002 a top of the range computer requires at least 64 Mb of memory to run a simulated Moon landing, and that does not include the memory required to take off again once landed. The alleged computer on board Apollo 11 had 32k of memory. That’s the equivalent of a simple calculator.

29) If debris from the Apollo missions was left on the Moon, then it would be visible today through a powerful telescope, however no such debris can be seen. The Clementine probe that recently mapped the Moons surface failed to show any Apollo artefacts left by Man during the missions. Where did the Moon Buggy and base of the LM go?

30) In the year 2005 NASA does not have the technology to land any man, or woman on the Moon, and return them safely to Earth.

31) Film evidence has recently been uncovered of a mis-labelled, unedited, behind-the-scenes video film, showing the crew of Apollo 11 staging part of their photography. The film evidence is shown in the video A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon!” And appears above in the ‘Why did Apollo 11 Astronauts Lie about being in Deep Space?’

32) Why did the blueprints and plans for the Lunar Module and Moon Buggy get destroyed if this was one of History’s greatest accomplishments?

33) Why did NASA need to airbrush out anomalies from lunar footage of the Moon if they have nothing to hide? The Apollo mission was meticulously planned, yet there were still flaws in the plan which the public is being made aware of as time goes on. Unlike a simple game of bingo where nothing is planned and no strategy is involved the Apollo mission was thought out and at the time there seemed to be an answer to every question that arose. As times change and more research is being done on the mission the tables are beginning to turn and the public is starting to see the truth. nasaindx.htm

 


 

     Thanks to:   http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off